Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case series shows upadacitinib controls IBD in 2 of 4 patients after liver transplantation, suggesting careful monitoring due to liver enzyme elevations.
Purpose Approximately 2% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and some require liver transplantation (LT). Managing IBD after LT is challenging given concomitant anti-rejection immunotherapies. We report our experience using upadacitinib (UPA) to treat patients with IBD after LT. Methods Retrospective, single-center observational study at a tertiary center, identifying patients after LT who received UPA. We assessed efficacy and safety of UPA. Results Four patients after LT (Crohn’s disease n = 3; ulcerative colitis n = 1) received UPA for IBD control ( n = 3) or as a steroid-sparing adjunct for anti-rejection ( n = 1), alongside anti-rejection immunosuppression. Median follow-up from UPA initiation was 10.5 months (IQR 8.9–14.6); age 41.5 years (IQR 40–44); interval from LT 3.2 years (IQR 2.3–5.6). Two receiving prednisone for Crohn’s control at baseline achieved steroid-free remission (Harvey–Bradshaw Index < 5). Three developed liver enzyme elevation: one stopped UPA at one month with subsequent normalization of alanine and aspartate aminotransferase; one underwent liver biopsy showing no rejection and continued UPA with 9-month follow-up; and one receiving UPA for potential anti-organ rejection plus vedolizumab ultimately discontinued UPA for suspected rejection after tapering steroids. One patient experienced mild COVID-19 that resolved without treatment change. No life-threatening adverse events were observed. Conclusion In this small series, UPA controlled IBD activity in 2 of 4 patients after LT but was associated with liver-enzyme elevations in 3, prompting discontinuation in 2. These findings support cautious, closely monitored use and highlight the need for a larger multi-center study of UPA in patients with IBD after LT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyatani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: