Prospective analysis reveals a strong correlation between external jugular and central venous oxygen saturation in anesthetized dogs, indicating potential for less invasive monitoring options.
Objective To assess the correlation, agreement, and trending ability between external jugular venous oxygen saturation (SejvO 2 ) and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO 2 ) across varying hemodynamic states in anesthetized dogs. Methods This prospective, nonrandomized, repeated-measures study included 6 healthy dogs. Each dog was anesthetized, paralyzed, and mechanically ventilated. Six sequential hemodynamic states were induced: baseline, controlled hemorrhage, isotonic crystalloid resuscitation, autotransfusion, continuous rate infusion of dobutamine, and administration of high-concentration isoflurane. Simultaneous blood samples were collected from a central venous catheter and an external jugular venous catheter. Paired SejvO 2 and ScvO 2 values were analyzed for correlation, agreement, and trending ability. Results 36 paired samples were obtained. External jugular venous oxygen saturation and ScvO 2 were strongly correlated ( r = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.84). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of −4.47% (95% CI, −7.34% to −1.60%) with limits of agreement from −14.25% (95% CI, −17.70% to −10.81%) to 5.31% (95% CI, 1.87% to 8.76%), exceeding the predefined ± 8% threshold. The concordance rate was 66.7% (95% CI, 47.2% to 82.7%) and improved to 87.5% (95% CI, 61.7% to 98.4%) when applying an exclusion zone of ± 5%, indicating moderate trending ability. Conclusions SejvO 2 correlated strongly with ScvO 2 but lacked sufficient agreement for direct substitution. However, it demonstrated moderate ability to track directional changes under different hemodynamic conditions. Clinical Relevance SejvO 2 may serve as a less invasive option for serial monitoring of oxygen balance when direct ScvO 2 measurement is not feasible, supporting its potential role in critical care monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: