Systematic review and meta-analysis assess brain network properties in chronic pain patients, suggesting pathophysiological insights.
Introduction Identifying brain topology alterations in chronic pain is a crucial step in understanding its pathophysiology. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess alterations in resting-state functional and structural global network properties in patients with chronic pain. Methods Following the preregistration (PROSPERO CRD42024542390), databases were searched for studies comparing connectivity-based whole-brain global network properties between patients with chronic pain and healthy controls. Risk of bias was assessed using an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Random-effect meta-analyses were conducted for each global network property separately. Results A total of 32 functional topology studies and 17 structural topology studies were included in the qualitative review, with 27 functional topology studies and 17 structural topology studies eligible for meta-analysis across nine unique structural and functional global network properties. The number of participants per meta-analysis ranged from 178 to 1,592. There was low-certainty evidence that chronic pain patients showed impairments in local efficiency of resting-state functional whole-brain topology (SMD: −0.50, 95%-CI: −0.81 to −0.19, 95%-PI: −1.38 to 0.38), and low to very low-certainty evidence that structural whole-brain topology was not altered in chronic pain across nine global network properties. The heterogeneity was high in the majority of functional (I 2 : 1–76%) and structural (I 2 : 68–97%) topology studies. Most functional (50%) and structural (65%) topology studies showed some concern regarding the risk of bias. Discussion The meta-analyses indicate that functional but not structural whole-brain topological reorganisation is involved in the pathophysiology of chronic pain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Butry et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: