Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 18, 2025The Journal of Clinical Ethics

A Great Gift … with Great Caveats: Bioethics Mediation versus Bona Fide Mediation

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

EME. H. MorreimEME. H. Morreim

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analysis reveals bioethics mediation may alter key values in clinical ethics consultation, indicating potential pitfalls.

Key Points

  • This analysis examines differences between bioethics mediation and traditional mediation processes.
  • Review of clinical ethics mediation in healthcare settings
  • Comparison of traditional ethics consultation with bioethics mediation
  • Evaluation of the impact on neutrality, self-determination, and privacy
  • Bioethics mediation often revises central tenets such as neutrality and privacy
  • Concerns raised about the authenticity of the mediation process
  • Mediation presents benefits but also has inherent risks when merged with ethics consultation

Cite This Study

Morreim et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6924fef4c0ce034ddc351cb4https://doi.org/10.1086/737397
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Dialogic Engagement and the Epistemic Norms of Bioethics Mediation2025
  2. 2Defending Dubler’s Legacy: Relocating the Role of Conflict Management from the Ethics Consultation Service to Patient and Guest Relations2025
  3. 3Nancy Dubler’s Contributions to Clinical Ethics Consultation2025
  4. 4Mediation of Medical Distrust due to Racial Injustice: The Legacy of Nancy Dubler2025
  5. 5Applications of Medical Mediation: A Systematic Review of Its Role in Healthcare Dispute Resolution and Bioethical Decision-Making2025 · 3 citations