Findings reveal that 76% of IBS patients show hypersensitivity to a non-invasive lactulose test, suggesting a link to visceral hypersensitivity and related symptoms.
Background: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients often experience meal-related symptoms, which might be related to visceral hypersensitivity. The Lactulose Nutrient Challenge Test (LNCT) is a non-invasive measure of sensitivity in relation to a meal. We aimed to define a cut-off for hypersensitivity to LNCT based on results in healthy volunteers, and to characterize patients with LNCT hypersensitivity. Methods: IBS patients (n=273) and healthy volunteers (n=133) that completed LNCT were included. During LNCT, eight symptoms are rated on Likert scales and breath hydrogen/methane is assessed every 15min for 4h. Additional questionnaires assessed severity of GI, somatic and psychological symptoms. A subset completed oro-anal transit time and rectal sensitivity investigations. LNCT hypersensitivity was defined based on the average area under the curve of healthy volunteers (95th percentiles) for abdominal pain, bloating, and gas/flatulence. Statistics included univariate and logistic regression [OR (95% CI)] analyses. Results: In total, 76% of IBS patients were hypersensitive to LNCT. These patients had distinct characteristics, as they were more frequently female, reported more severe GI, non-GI somatic, and psychological symptoms, and had higher breath hydrogen production and lower rectal pain thresholds. More severe GI symptoms [2.05 (1.05–3.99)], lower rectal pain threshold [0.93 (0.88–0.99)], and higher breath hydrogen production [1.14 (1.02–1.29)] were identified as independent predictors of hypersensitivity to LNCT. Discussion: The LNCT is useful as a non-invasive and physiologic tool to test GI sensory function in relation to a meal. Moreover, overall GI symptom reporting, visceral hypersensitivity, and hydrogen production are important factors involved in postprandial symptoms in IBS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Algera et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: