Bayesian optimization improves Limiting Oxygen Index in polypropylene composites, suggesting enhanced fire safety.
The traditional optimization of intumescent flame-retardant polypropylene (PP) relies on large experimental campaigns that scale poorly with compositional dimensionality, limiting the systematic exploration of tradeoffs between fire performance and material economy. We present a Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization (MOBO) workflow that couples Gaussian Process (GP) surrogates with the q-Noisy Expected Hypervolume Improvement (qNEHVI) acquisition to co-optimize two competing objectives: maximize the Limiting Oxygen Index (LOI) and minimize total flame-retardant (FR) loading (wt.%). Two practical initialization strategies, Space-Filling Design and literature-guided sampling, are benchmarked, and convergence is monitored via dominated hypervolume and uncertainty calibration. Uniform design-space coverage yields faster hypervolume growth and better-calibrated uncertainty than literature seeding. Under a 20-experiment budget, the best formulation attains an LOI = 27.0 vol.% at 22.74 wt.% FR, corresponding to an estimated 8–14% efficiency gain, defined here as LOI improvement at comparable FR loadings relative to representative baselines. The recovered APP/PER stoichiometric ratios (1.69–2.26) are consistent with established intumescence mechanisms, indicating that a data-driven search can converge to physically meaningful solutions without explicit mechanistic priors. The proposed workflow provides a sample-efficient route to navigate multi-criteria design spaces in flame-retardant PP and is transferable to polymer systems in which performance, cost, and processing constraints must be balanced and exhaustive testing is impractical.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verret et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: