Mendelian randomization shows air pollution increases ovarian cancer risk, suggesting a need for public health interventions.
In recent years, an increasing number of observational studies have reported the impact of air pollution on ovarian cancer. However, a Mendelian randomization (MR) study to explore the causal relationship in ovarian cancer has not yet been conducted. This study, based on 2-sample MR, conducts MR analysis by examining 5 air pollution indices with ovarian cancer data from 2 different sources. Subsequently, a meta-analysis of the primary inverse-variance weighted results is performed, followed by multiple corrections on the meta-analysis thresholds to ensure accuracy. Finally, a reverse causality verification of the positive air pollution indices with ovarian cancer is conducted through MR analysis. The MR analysis was conducted using 5 air pollution indices and ovarian cancer data from the Finngen R10 and OpenGWAS databases. A meta-analysis was then performed on the inverse-variance weighted results from both sets of analyses. Multiple corrections were applied to the significance threshold of the meta-analysis results, revealing an odds ratio value of 1.544 (95% confidence interval: 1.180–2.020, P = .0077). Additionally, the positive air pollution index, nitrogen dioxide, showed no reverse causality with ovarian cancer in both data sources. Nitrogen dioxide is a risk factor for ovarian cancer and may increase the risk, accelerating the onset and progression of the disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: