Conceptualization reveals multidimensional safety voice in employees, suggesting improved intervention design and safety-related communication.
Previous conceptualizations of safety voice have described this construct as fundamentally unidimensional, compared to several other multidimensional models that have been outlined for the more general concept of employee voice. Drawing from previous studies in occupational safety, previous safety voice conceptualizations (challenge vs. defense of safety systems), dynamic safety capability, and wise proactivity, we outline an extended conceptualization of safety voice. Adopting a functionalist approach, we identified and described promotive, preventive, prohibitive, and hostile safety voice. For each type, we discuss the definition, its function, its implications, and examples. This multidimensional conceptualization provides a conceptual structure that supports more accurate measurement, intervention design, and discussions surrounding safety-related communication. It also clarifies when and how distinct forms of safety voice emerge, identifies levers for system and leadership design, and outlines actionable implications and testable propositions for advancing prevention, learning, and research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bazzoli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: