Retrospective analysis identifies deep learning models predicting AKI progression, indicating strong use of comorbidities and blood urea nitrogen.
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is an abrupt decline in kidney function that occurs in about 20% of hospitalized admissions and may lead to irreversible kidney damage. Methods: We developed and externally validated deep learning models to dynamically predict progression to Stage 2 or higher AKI defined by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes serum creatinine criteria within the next 48 hours. We used an extensive set of predictors including demographics, admission source, comorbidities, medications, laboratory and vitals measurements. Results: Our retrospective study includes adult non-critical care patients at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) (2018-2022; n=39,755) and the University of Florida Health (UFH) (2012-2019; n=122,324). In the UFH and UPMC development cohort, the mean age was 55 and 71 and 55% (n=47,350) and 54% (n=15,128) were female, respectively. Stage 2 or higher AKI occurred in 3% (n=3,257) and 8% (n=2,296) of UFH and UPMC patients, respectively. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values with 95% confidence interval (CI) ranged between 0.77 (95% CI 0.75-0.78) (UPMC Model-model trained on UPMC patients) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.79-0.82) (UFH Model-model trained on UF patients) for the UFH test cohort, and between 0.79 (95% CI 0.78,-0.8) (UFH Model) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.82-0.84) (UPMC Model) for the UPMC test cohort. UFH-UPMC Model achieved an AUROC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.80-0.83) for UFH and 0.82 (95% CI 0.81-0.84]) for UPMC test cohorts. Kinetic estimated glomerular filtration rate, nephrotoxic drug burden and blood urea nitrogen remained the features with the highest influence across the models and institutions. Conclusions: The model developed using multi-center data had robust performance, suggesting implementation could help prevent AKI progression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adiyeke et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: