Retrospective cohort study identifies incidence and risk factors for acute kidney injury in hospitalized urology patients, implying targeted monitoring for high-risk individuals.
Background/Objectives: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a clinically important complication among hospitalized urology patients. However, data from general urology inpatient populations remain limited. We aimed to assess AKI frequency in a monitored urology inpatient cohort, identify associated predictors, and develop an exploratory admission-based risk stratification model. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of adults admitted to a tertiary urology ward between June 2023 and May 2024 who had at least two serum creatinine measurements during hospitalization. AKI was defined according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) serum creatinine criteria. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and procedural data were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with AKI and was used to construct a reduced exploratory admission-based risk model. Results: Among 196 monitored patients, 67 (34.2%) developed AKI during hospitalization, and 82.1% had KDIGO Stage 1 AKI. Higher admission serum creatinine, hypertension, nephrolithiasis, and ureteral interventions were independently associated with AKI. AKI was also associated with longer hospitalization (6.4 ± 4.2 vs. 5.1 ± 3.2 days, p = 0.044). The reduced exploratory model identified low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with progressively increasing AKI incidence (7.7%, 32.3%, and 76%, respectively; AUC = 0.76). Conclusions: In this monitored cohort, AKI was frequent and associated with admission characteristics and prolonged hospitalization. These findings support targeted renal monitoring in higher-risk patients. The admission-based risk model is exploratory and requires validation in prospective multicenter cohorts before clinical implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iaina et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: