Multicentric study demonstrates HemoTypeSC shows 99.9% accuracy in detecting sickle cell disease, suggesting feasibility in resource-limited settings.
Background & objectives Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a common, life-limiting genetic disorder in India. It is best managed when diagnosed early through newborn screening, which requires a reliable, rapid and an affordable point-of-care test for diagnosis. The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of HemoTypeSC as point-of care for detecting SCD in newborn screening. Additionally, the study assessed the feasibility of implementing HemoTypeSC in poor resource settings. Methods We conducted a prospective multicentre diagnostic accuracy study using an investigational assay HemoTypeSC, and compared it with the reference (‘Gold-standard’) High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) during the year 2019-20. Six different study centers were selected to evaluate the performance of the test across different climatic and geographical locations. Results A total of 1725 newborn babies were screened from six participating centers. The samples were analyzed by both HemoTypeSC and HPLC. HemoTypeSC correctly identified the 14/15 SCD cases [sensitivity 93.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 68-99.8%) and specificity 100% (95% CI: 99.7-100%)] and 192/200 sickle cell trait cases [sensitivity 96% (92.2-98.2%, CI 95%) and specificity 99.8% (95% CI: 99.5-99.9%)]. The accuracy of HemoTypeSC to detect SCD and sickle cell trait was found to be 99.9 per cent (95% CI: 99.6-100%) and 99.5 per cent (95% CI: 99-99.7%), respectively. Interpretation & conclusions HemoTypeSC can be a viable alternative to HPLC in resource-limited regions with a high prevalence of SCD to provide timely diagnosis and support newborn screening programmes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thaker et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: