Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Critical review highlights systemic therapies and diagnostic improvements for neuroendocrine neoplasms, suggesting ongoing developments.
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are biologically diverse tumors. This article is a critical review of recent evidence focusing on systemic therapies (through mid-2025). We summarize what is most practice-relevant and where gaps remain. In diagnosis, somatostatin-receptor PET/CT has largely replaced older scintigraphy, and adding FDG PET can flag more aggressive disease. Blood-based tests and selected tissue markers (e.g., MGMT, DAXX/ATRX/ALT) show promise but require cautious interpretation in routine care. In treatment, radioligand therapy (PRRT) is used earlier in appropriate receptor-positive disease; cabozantinib improves progression-free survival after prior therapy; and belzutifan offers a biomarker-guided option for malignant pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma. Immunotherapy remains limited to defined subsets, including high-grade neoplasms. We appraise strengths and limitations of key trials, note issues of access and toxicity, and highlight active areas in development (SSTR antagonists, alpha emitters, and dose-guided PRRT). Our goal is to provide a concise, evidence-based map of the field to support informed clinical judgment and future research priorities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hernandez-Felix et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: