This analysis demonstrates that a new damage modeling approach accurately predicts fatigue life in stainless steel, highlighting how loading affects damage mechanisms.
Fatigue damage is critical for 0Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb stainless-steel components that may operate near yield under stress-controlled cycles and occasional peak holds. This work investigates the cyclic response of 0Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb stainless-steel under near-yield-stress-controlled (NYSC) loading and proposes a unified damage framework that bridges monotonic ductile fracture, near-yield stress-controlled fatigue. Building on the Enhanced Lou-Yoon model, an elastic-damage term is introduced and embedded within a continuum damage mechanics framework, allowing elastic (sub-yield) and plastic (post-yield, Ultra-Low-Cycle-Fatigue/Low-Cycle-Fatigue (ULCF/LCF)) damage to be treated in a unified, path-averaged stress-state description defined by stress triaxiality and the Lode parameter. Five stress-controlled test groups are examined, with applied load amplitudes from 20.6 to 25.1 kN (equivalent stress amplitudes 858~1044 MPa) yielding fatigue lives ranging from 32 to 13,570 cycles. The extended model captures the evolution of damage origin mechanisms from elasticity-dominated to plasticity-dominated as loading severity increases, demonstrating a unified elastic-plastic damage modeling approach. As a result, it accurately predicts fatigue lives spanning two orders of magnitude with an average absolute percentage error of approximately 14.5% across all conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: