Digital ethnography reveals resistance and adaptive strategies among ride-hailing drivers, indicating the impact of informal governance systems on autonomy and mutual aid.
This study examines the intersection of digital labour platforms and informal governance in Bogotá, Colombia, with a focus on the adaptive strategies employed by ride-hailing drivers within contexts of institutional fragility and urban inequality. Employing digital ethnography and visual methods, the research analyses the emergence of Drivers Club Bogotá, a grassroots network utilising technologies such as WhatsApp and Zello for coordination, mutual aid and resistance. The findings highlight how drivers created informal governance systems based on autonomy, reciprocity and dignity, effectively responding to institutional distrust and regulatory gaps, particularly intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic. The article argues for adopting a ‘partner state’ policy framework, supporting grassroots innovations without compromising their autonomy, and expanding existing knowledge on platform governance by illustrating informal governance as simultaneously a pragmatic survival strategy and a form of institutional innovation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paredes et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: