Observational analysis captures settlement dynamics in urban tunneling, suggesting optimal reinforcement can enhance railway safety.
Shield tunneling beneath existing railways remains a critical challenge in urban infrastructure development, as it risks destabilizing overlying soil structures and compromising railway safety. This study presents an integrated methodology combining physical model tests and three-dimensional numerical simulation, validated by their mutual agreement, to capture the settlement and deformation induced by twin shield tunneling beneath an operational railway under the complex geological conditions of the Qingdao Metro. A parametric study was subsequently conducted to systematically evaluate the influence of critical construction parameters, including grouting pressure, grout stiffness, and chamber pressure, on railhead settlement. Additionally, a comparative analysis assessed the effectiveness of settlement control measures, including D-type beam reinforcement, deep-hole grouting reinforcement, and their combined application. Results show that railhead deformation primarily manifests as settlement, with cumulative effects from sequential tunneling of the left and right lines. Proximity to fault zones intensifies crown subsidence, while tunneling induces significant soil stress relaxation, particularly in geologically weaker strata. Within optimal ranges, increased grouting pressure, chamber pressure, and grout stiffness effectively reduce railhead settlement; however, their efficacy diminishes beyond specific thresholds. The combined D-type beam and deep-hole grouting reinforcement scheme proved most effective in controlling settlement, ensuring railway operational safety and construction stability. These findings provide essential theoretical and practical guidance for optimizing shield tunneling strategies in complex urban environments, enhancing the safety and reliability of critical railway infrastructure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: