Seismic risk assessment reveals a concentrated susceptibility pattern in Seoul, indicating targeted risk-reduction strategies may be necessary.
Seismic risk assessment in megacities requires a high-resolution spatial framework that can capture the intrinsic heterogeneity of local geology, building distribution, and population characteristics beyond conventional administrative boundaries. This study develops a hazard-independent seismic susceptibility framework for the Seoul Metropolitan Area, a megacity of approximately 9.5 million residents (as of 2024), where historical and instrumental earthquake records are limited. The proposed framework integrates nine standardized indicators across geotechnical, structural, and social domains within a vulnerability–exposure model, analyzed on a 250 m grid—approximately 300 times finer than district-level assessments. Domain-specific indices and the integrated Seismic Susceptibility Index (SSI) were derived using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)-based weighting to quantify the relative importance of indicators. Results show a highly concentrated spatial pattern of susceptibility: only 2.2% of Seoul (229 grids, 14.3 km2) falls within the high-to-very-high categories, primarily in northern and southwestern residential zones characterized by soft soils, aging buildings, and vulnerable populations. The proposed framework supports targeted risk-reduction strategies by providing a practical basis for pre-disaster decision-making and efficient allocation of mitigation resources in data-scarce urban environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: