Conceptual framework shows how high-impact practices improve student retention and educational quality, indicating a need for systemic change.
High-impact practices (HIPs)—structured educational experiences characterized by active learning, faculty mentorship, peer collaboration, and authentic application—have demonstrated effectiveness in improving student retention, learning outcomes, and degree completion. While early HIP scholarship focused primarily on individual student benefits, this conceptual framework positions HIPs as comprehensive organizational change strategies that reshape institutional cultures, resource allocations, faculty reward structures, and community partnerships. Drawing on foundational student development theory, meta-institutional empirical studies, and organizational change scholarship, this framework examines how systematic HIP implementation catalyzes transformation across multiple institutional dimensions simultaneously. The analysis synthesizes evidence on HIP design principles, organizational consequences, and implementation strategies, with particular attention to equity considerations often marginalized in educational innovation discourse. Rather than claiming comprehensive literature coverage, this framework offers a bounded synthesis connecting student success research, organizational theory, and civic engagement scholarship to illuminate HIPs' multidimensional transformative potential. The framework concludes that institutions treating HIPs as isolated pedagogical techniques miss their fuller capacity to advance educational quality, equity, and public purpose simultaneously—but that realizing this potential requires structural commitments extending far beyond curricular additions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Westover et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: