This review examines various methods for predicting remaining useful life in railway tracks, suggesting data-driven methods improve accuracy despite challenges.
Rail is one of the most basic components of railway tracks. Accurate prediction of rail remaining useful life is important for ensuring operational safety, optimizing maintenance resource allocation, and reducing operational costs. Nevertheless, research on rail remaining useful life prediction is limited, primarily due to the challenge of obtaining complete lifecycle data and the complexity of degradation mechanisms. This paper presents a review of the literature on rail remaining useful life prediction, with a focused summary of the developmental trends, advantages, and limitations of three predominant methodologies: mechanism-analysis methods, data-driven methods, and mechanism analysis & data-driven fusion methods. The results show that the material wear loss model and crack propagation model are mostly used in the mechanism-analysis methods, the remaining useful life of rail is predicted by modeling the degradation mechanism model. Despite its high predictive accuracy, the mechanism analysis model for rail crack and wear evolution has limitations, including complex modeling procedures and a narrow range of applicability. The data-driven method analyzes the data monitored throughout the full lifecycle of the rails, mine the rail degradation law hidden behind the data, and predicts the remaining useful life of the rail through the statistical probability method and machine learning; Although this method can be rapidly deployed with a sufficient volume of high-quality monitoring data, its predictive accuracy is susceptible to data noise. The mechanism analysis & data-driven fusion methods simultaneously analyze the rail defects mechanism and monitoring data, and use the rail monitoring data to estimate the parameters of the mechanism degradation model, improving the accuracy of rail remaining useful life prediction. This method requires a grasp of the rail deterioration mechanism and abundant monitoring data, thereby inheriting the strengths and limitations of the aforementioned two approaches. Finally, the challenges and potential research directions in the future are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
YuanCAO et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: