Imaging fusion enhances detection of brain metastases, indicating improved management for breast cancer patients with tumor recurrence.
BACKGROUND MRI is the standard imaging modality for brain metastases (BrMs) evaluation; however, BrMs are difficult to characterize especially when prior treatments such as radiation therapy (RT) were administered. [18F]-fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) PET imaging can further characterize estrogen receptor positive (ER+) BrMs to inform management decisions. METHODS We identified ER+ breast cancer patients with BrMs who underwent 18F-FES PET between 2023-2024. Baseline characteristics were recorded. The FES-PET was fused with MRI brain and all lesions were reviewed. Discrepancies between PET and MRI findings were documented. The impact on clinical decision making was analyzed; each case was reviewed by a multidisciplinary team. RESULTS Twelve patients (77 BrMs) were included. In 8 patients with previous SRS, 18F-FES PET/MRI brain fusion distinguished between tumor recurrence vs radiation necrosis in 17 lesions. 5 lesions were deemed recurrent and retreated with GK SRS, resected (pathology-confirmed), or started on systemic therapy. All demonstrated improved radiographic, post-treatment imaging. Twelve non-avid lesions demonstrated clinical stability/improvement on subsequent MRI. Two patients had prior WBRT. The first had 26 lesions – 16 enhancing on MRI with 11 (69%) PET-avid. MRI demonstrated a mixed response; PET detected an additional 5 lesions. Clear progression was seen on follow-up MRI requiring repeat WBRT. The second had 31 lesions – 28 enhancing on MRI with 14 (50%) PET-avid. Systemic therapy was continued with stable, subsequent MRIs. MRI alone missed 10 lesions detected by 18F-FES PET in the cohort. Two patients had uncertain etiology; one confirmed meningioma and the other was suspected toxoplasmosis. Treatment was withheld due to non-avidity on 18F-FES PET. Management was modified for 11 patients (92%) following PET acquisition. CONCLUSIONS 18F-FES PET/MRI fusion offers valuable diagnostic advantages over MRI alone for detection of BrMs and clarification between residual tumor vs post-treatment changes. The results underscore the increased sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FES PET. Incorporating structural and molecular-based imaging enhances lesion detection and provides critical information that can impact clinical decision making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wuu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: