Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis characterizes uptake patterns in benign lesions and breast cancer subtypes, suggesting practical imaging insights.
Background/Objectives: Estrogen receptor (ER) expression is a key biomarker in breast cancer (BC) and guides endocrine therapy selection. Estrogen receptor-targeted imaging with 16ɑ-[18F]-fluoro-17β-estradiol (18F-FES) PET is recommended in several clinical guidelines for noninvasive assessment of ER status. In clinical practice, 18F-FES PET may also identify ER-negative malignancies or benign breast lesions with variable uptake patterns. This study aimed to systematically characterize 18F-FES PET/MRI uptake patterns in benign breast lesions and across breast cancer subtypes defined by receptor status, histology, and molecular phenotype. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 41 women with 50 breast lesions who underwent simultaneous 18F-FES PET/MRI prior to any treatment. Histopathology or long-term follow-up served as the standard of reference. Maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean) were derived using MRI-based lesion delineation. Results: Both benign and malignant breast lesions measuring < 10 mm demonstrated low 18F-FES uptake (SUVmax < 1.00). 18F-FES uptake among benign breast lesions was variable, with SUVmax ranging from 0.44 to 1.57. In contrast, ER-positive lesions ≥ 10 mm exhibited substantially higher 18F-FES uptake (median SUVmax 2.76; range 1.23–9.74) compared with ER-negative tumors of similar size (SUVmax 0.30–0.94). 18F-FES uptake was consistent across histologic BC subtypes and did not differ significantly among ER-positive molecular subtypes. No significant associations were observed with HER2 status or tumor grade. Conclusions: Awareness of the heterogeneous 18F-FES uptake patterns in benign breast lesions, as well as the limited sensitivity for detecting ER-positive tumors < 10 mm, is essential for accurate image interpretation. 18F-FES PET/MRI enables reliable assessment of ER expression in BC lesions ≥ 10 mm, with uptake patterns remaining consistent across molecular and histologic subtypes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spiegel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: