Qualitative study reveals factors affecting preparedness in newly qualified nurses, suggesting improvements in curricula development and mentorship.
Aim The aim of this study was to examine the perceived preparedness of newly qualified nurses for clinical practice, with a focus on those factors that contribute to any lack of preparedness. Being prepared for practice is essential for achieving professional goals and reducing unwanted patient and organisational outcomes. The preparedness of newly qualified nurses to practice independently is a topic of debate; however, the factors that cause a lack of preparedness have not been explored thoroughly. Design This exploratory study utilised a descriptive and contextual design and thematic analysis. Methods The researcher utilised a qualitative methodology for their research. The population of the study was 16 newly qualified nurses, who were chosen through convenience sampling. This study was conducted from August to October 2020 at four campuses that offered a 4‐year Bachelor of Nursing Science (Clinical) (BNSc) Honours Degree. Data were gathered via semi‐structured interviews until the point at which data saturation was reached. Following this, thematic analysis was undertaken. Results The analysis of the data led to the development of four themes, that is, student confidence and competence; lack of confidence and competence; resource‐related challenges and suggested changes to improve perceived challenges. Conclusion This study's findings have showed that newly qualified nurses experienced some contextual challenges during their four‐year training in fulfilment of their professional roles; they appeared well‐prepared for their clinical roles. Their contextual challenges were as a result of insufficient knowledge, a lack of clinical exposure to some departments, a theory‐practice gap, and insufficient placement time for clinical practice. Patient or Public Contribution The findings of this study can be used to develop targeted interventions and ongoing strategies that would inform clinical practice and future curricula development and facilitate improvement of clinical supervision and mentorship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashipala et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: