Quantitative analysis reveals influencer performance affects consumer trust and purchasing behavior across demographics.
This research investigates the complex dynamics of the influencer marketing ecosystem in India, focusing on the alignment and divergence between consumer trust, influencer strategies, and brand expectations. Through a quantitative analysis of 250 respondents, comprising 239 consumers and 21 influencers, this study examines the critical factors that shape audience perception, purchasing behavior, and platform engagement. The findings reveal a significant disconnect between the values prioritized by consumers and the metrics valued by brands. Consumers predicate their trust on perceived authenticity, personal connection, and relatable content, whereas brands are perceived to prioritize performance, reach, and content quality defined by engagement metrics. This core conflict is the primary driver of trust, particularly when content becomes overly commercialized or scripted. The study confirms a strong inverse correlation between consumer age and susceptibility to influencer persuasion, with younger demographics being most receptive. A notable "platform generation gap" is identified, with YouTube and Instagram showing universal appeal, while Facebook and X (formerly Twitter) exhibit highly age-segregated user bases. Analysis of purchasing behavior indicates that influencer recommendations are most effective for lifestyle-oriented categories such as fashion, electronics, and beauty, which are conducive to visual demonstration. Ultimately, this paper argues that the long-term sustainability of influencer marketing depends on bridging the gap between consumer expectations and creator strategies. It concludes that a strategic shift towards prioritizing authenticity over purely performance-based metrics, coupled with data-informed, age-tailored platform selection, is essential for maintaining audience trust and ensuring the continued efficacy of this marketing channel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anmol Bansal (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: