Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis reveals cognitive neuroscience models shape understanding of motor representations, suggesting a distinct topographic feature.
Philosophers have talked about non-propositional (or non-conceptual) motor representations for a while now. However, a clear and detailed account of their structure remains elusive. In this paper I argue that certain motor representations exhibit a topographic, map-like structure. This claim is supported by cognitive neuroscience models that describe the representational transitions underlying saccadic eye movements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denis Buehler (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: