This review demonstrates how artificial intelligence improves quality enhancement in drilling, indicating more efficient processes through advanced sensors.
Drilling is fundamental to the assembly of aerospace structures, where millions of fastening holes must meet stringent structural and geometric requirements. Despite significant technological advances, hole quality remains sensitive to nonlinear and stochastic interactions between mechanics, thermal effects, tribology, and structural configuration. This review consolidates recent advances in intelligent drilling, focusing on how sensors and artificial intelligence (AI) are integrated to enable process understanding, prediction, and control. In-process monitoring modalities (e.g., cutting forces/torque, vibration, acoustic emission, motor current/active power, infrared thermography, and vision) are examined with respect to signal characteristics, feature design, and modelling choices for real-time anomaly detection, tool condition monitoring, and phase/interface recognition. Predictive quality modelling of burr, delamination, roughness, and roundness is discussed across statistical learning, kernel methods, and neural and hybrid models. Offline parameter optimisation via surrogate-assisted and evolutionary algorithms is considered alongside adaptive control strategies. Practical aspects of robotic drilling and multifunctional end-effectors are highlighted as enablers of embedded sensing and feedback. Finally, cross-cutting challenges (e.g., limited, heterogeneous datasets and model generalisability across materials, tools, and geometries) are outlined, together with research directions including curated multi-sensor benchmarks, multi-source transfer learning, physics-informed machine learning, and explainable AI to support trustworthy deployment in aerospace manufacturing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panico et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: