Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 28, 2025Environmental Policy and Law

Building a Corpus Iuris Climatis : Making Sense of the ICJ and the IACtHR Advisory Opinions on Climate Emergency

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

CSCecilia I. Silberberg

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analysis reveals advisory opinions highlight intergenerational equity and cooperation in climate governance.

Key Points

  • Climate governance is redefined through advisory opinions addressing environmental protection and human rights,
  • Both courts engage foundational principles like due diligence and prevention, shaping international law.
  • Judicial interpretation explores the nuances of universal and regional jurisdictions in climate response.
  • This analysis highlights interactions between legal frameworks and scientific expertise in confronting the climate crisis.

Cite This Study

Cecilia I. Silberberg (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6928f113a65b730b9ea79e6dhttps://doi.org/10.1177/18785395251397298
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Building a <i>Corpus Iuris Climatis</i> : Making Sense of the ICJ and the IACtHR Advisory Opinions on Climate Emergency2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2International Human Rights and the Climate Emergency: An Examination of the Climate Advisory Opinions of the International Court of Justice and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights2025
  3. 3Situating the ICJ's advisory opinion in the wider ecosystem of international climate litigation2026
  4. 4Wayfinders for Climate Change Action: The ICJ, ITLOS, and IACtHR Advisory Opinions on Climate Change2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5In between the missed opportunities and future possibilities: human rights in the ICJ's advisory opinion on climate change and the prospects for climate litigation2026