Combination treatment reveals necrotic cell death in cancer cell lines, suggesting a novel approach for targeting oxidative stress.
Background: The combination of manganese porphyrins (MnPs) and ascorbate (ASC) represents a promising redox-based therapeutic approach for selectively targeting cancer cells. We investigated the cytotoxic effects of two structurally distinct MnPs (MnTPPS and MnF2BMet) with differing lipophilicity and potential membrane permeability in combination with ASC. Methods: Cancer cell lines (MCF-7, PANC-1, U87, T98G, AT-2) and normal human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) were treated with MnTPPS and MnF2BMet in the absence or presence of ASC. Viability, migration potential, and intracellular oxidative stress were assessed using single-cell methods. Results: MnPs alone exhibited no intrinsic cytostatic or cytotoxic activity, as confirmed by proliferation, viability, and motility assays. When combined with ASC, both MnTPPS and MnF2BMet significantly enhanced ASC-induced oxidative stress, leading to lipid peroxidation, glutathione depletion, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cell membrane disruption. Time-lapse microscopy revealed rapid necrotic cell death under co-treatment. Catalase fully abolished cytotoxicity, indicating the essential role of hydrogen peroxide. In contrast, dehydroascorbate (DHA), which increases intracellular ASC levels, did not induce the same toxicity, suggesting that extracellular ROS generation contributes predominantly to the observed effects. Normal fibroblasts were minimally affected, supporting the MnPs–ASC system’s selectivity toward cancer cells. Conclusions: MnTPPS and MnF2BMet enhance extracellular oxidation of ascorbate and subsequent ROS production, leading to selective oxidative-stress-mediated cancer cell death. This study supports the potential of MnPs–ASC redox catalysis as a complementary oxidative-stress-based anticancer strategy and highlights the need for further mechanistic and structure–activity investigations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rąpała et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: