Analysis shows power systems improve frequency regulation in wind turbines, indicating fuzzy logic enhances control strategies.
The increasing integration of wind power into modern power systems has fostered the demand for reliable frequency regulation strategies, with inertial control emerging as a key solution that utilizes the kinetic energy stored in the wind turbine rotors. Traditional inertial controllers, however, usually depend on fixed gain parameters, which restrict their adaptability under changing grid conditions. This paper introduces a new inertial control strategy that combines a fuzzy logic controller with the Extended Optimized Power Point Tracking (OPPTE) algorithm to improve the frequency response of wind turbines. The fuzzy logic system allows adaptive control by responding dynamically to both frequency deviations and their rate of change, thereby adjusting the turbine’s operating point during emergency events. By shifting the operating point, the system can release more kinetic energy at critical moments, resulting in improved active power injection. The proposed approach was tested through simulation studies in MATLAB/Simulink R2024b using a detailed wind turbine model under various contingency scenarios. The results obtained demonstrate that the proposed strategy surpasses the conventional OPPTE method by significantly improving the maximum value of active power injected into the electrical grid by 6.56% and 9.68% under constant wind and wind series conditions, respectively, as well as reductions in the frequency nadir of 9.6% and 6.4%, and decreases in the frequency change rate of 5% and 4.57% in the exact scenarios. These results demonstrate that combining fuzzy logic with dynamic operating point adjustment provides a practical and effective way to strengthen inertial support and improve grid stability in power systems with high wind power integration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loza et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: