Pilot study explores player perceptions and selection procedures in U15 and U16 ice hockey, highlighting agility improvements.
We investigated players' and coaches' experiences and perceptions of bio-banding in U15 and U16 elite ice hockey teams. Secondarily, the distribution of maturity timing and the relationship between maturity status and fitness performance were examined. Forty-three male players (14.7 ± 0.6 years) participated. Maturity status and timing were estimated using the Khamis-Roche method and population reference data. Fitness tests were also performed. Perceptions were assessed using 5-point Likert-scale questionnaires and coach interviews. Players reported opportunities for new social contacts during bio-banding, which contradicted the coaches' initial concerns. Players moving to a less advanced (maturity status) bio-band perceived more responsibility and beneficial use of speed/size and reported more puck possession (Likert score 4.0/5). Players moving to a more advanced bio-band saw more technical/tactical challenges (4.3/5). Coaches recognized benefits such as individualizing training and improving selection procedures. U16 players showed earlier maturity timing compared to the Swedish reference population (P < 0.05); U15 players did not differ. Maturity status correlated with strength (r = 0.59), agility (r = -0.6), explosive power (r = 0.51), and endurance (r = 0.53) (all P < 0.01). We conclude that bio-banding offers benefits for players across the maturity timing spectrum and for coaches in several areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindholm et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: