Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review reveals bio-banding enhances leadership and psychological skills in elite youth athletes, suggesting its utility alongside chronological age grouping.
Talent development has traditionally relied on chronological age grouping, which does not account for variations in biological maturity among players. Bio-banding addresses this by matching players based on biological maturity rather than chronological age. This mixed-methods systematic review synthesised evidence on the psychosocial effects of bio-banding. A systematic literature search across seven databases identified 12 studies reporting the psychosocial effects of bio-banding interventions in elite youth sport contexts. Studies varied in method (four quantitative, two qualitative, six mixed-methods), intervention design, sport context, and psychosocial effects measured. Studies were analysed using a convergent integrated approach adhering to Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for mixed-method systematic reviews. Four analytical themes were identified: (1) enhanced psychological skill visibility and development, (2) leadership as a prominent psychosocial outcome for later maturers, (3) constructive challenges for psychological growth, (4) implementation friction: terminology, cohesion, and perceived social risk. Bio-banding was perceived to promote confidence, leadership, self-expression, and psychosocial skills, though the evidence was limited by reliance on self-report and stakeholder perceptions. Future research employing validated psychometric tools and longitudinal designs is required to substantiate these effects and inform implementation. These findings support using bio-banding as an additional method alongside chronological age groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tucker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: