PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 30, 2025Language and Cognition5 citationsOpen Access

L2 interpretation of quantifier scope: influence of individual difference factors

View Full Paper
SFShaohua FangSWShuyan Wang

Key Points

  • Reduced, non-target-like access to quantifier scope results found in L2 learners with limited working memory and inhibitory control.
  • The picture selection task indicated that L2 learners faced challenges, particularly in interpreting inverse scope.
  • Effects of individual differences accentuated by cognitive factors showcased the complexities of language acquisition.
  • Study indicates that both domain-general and domain-specific mechanisms are requisite for understanding quantifier scope interpretations.

Abstract

Abstract This study investigated L2 learners’ interpretation of quantifier scope, focusing on the influence of individual differences, including L2 proficiency, working memory (WM) and inhibitory control (IC). A picture selection task using the covered-box paradigm (CBP) was conducted with 70 Chinese-speaking learners of English and a control group of 40 native English speakers. The results revealed that inverse scope (IS) posed particular challenges for L2 learners, leading to reduced, non-target-like access. We attribute this difficulty to factors such as negative L1 transfer, limited L2 input and increased processing demands associated with IS compared to surface scope (SS). More importantly, WM and IC significantly influenced L2 learners’ interpretation patterns, with their effects mediated by L2 proficiency. We also observed individual variation in scope interpretations among native speakers, particularly with negatively quantified (NQ) sentences. This variation provides valuable evidence of individual differences in native speakers’ grammatical knowledge and was partly driven by cognitive factors. Altogether, the findings contribute novel evidence for both domain-general and domain-specific mechanisms underlying quantifier scope interpretation in L2 learners as well as in native speakers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692b94341d383f2b2a378587https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2025.10040
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Psycholinguistics of Adult Second Language Acquisition2022 · 4 citations
  2. 2MULTIPLE REGRESSION AS A FLEXIBLE ALTERNATIVE TO ANOVA IN L2 RESEARCH2016 · 126 citations
  3. 3The processing of English which-questions in adult L2 learners: Effects of L1 transfer and proficiency2017 · 21 citations
  4. 4Data analysis and sampling2018 · 14 citations
  5. 5Reliability and validity assessment of working memory measurements2025 · 6 citations