Mendelian randomization identifies inflammatory proteins impacting Clostridium difficile colitis risk, suggesting metabolic links.
This Mendelian randomization (MR) study investigates the causal relationships between circulating inflammatory proteins, blood metabolites, and Clostridium difficile colitis (CDC), with a focus on potential metabolic mediation. Bidirectional and mediation MR analyses were performed using genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from 3384 CDC cases and 406,048 controls. The primary MR methods included inverse variance weighting (IVW) and MR-Egger regression, with MR-PRESSO applied to detect and correct horizontal pleiotropy. Sensitivity analyses, including leave-one-out tests, were conducted to ensure the robustness of the findings. Mediation analysis was performed using a two-step MR framework to estimate the causal effects of inflammatory proteins on metabolites and, subsequently, the impact of these metabolites on CDC risk. Bidirectional MR identified 2 inflammatory proteins associated with CDC risk. Higher IL-2 receptor subunit beta (IL-2RB) levels were protective against CDC (OR = 0.827, 95% CI = 0.718–0.953, P < .01), whereas increased IL-22 receptor subunit alpha-1 (IL-22RA1) levels elevated CDC risk (OR = 1.300, 95% CI = 1.078–1.570, P < .01). Unidirectional MR identified 11 plasma metabolites associated with CDC, including a positive correlation with spermidine-to-choline ratio. Mediation MR analysis suggested that 17.4% (−6.21%, 41%) of IL-2RB’s protective effect on CDC was mediated through this metabolite. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these associations. Our findings suggest that higher IL-2RB levels were protective against CDC, while increased IL-22RA1 levels were associated with higher risk. The Spermidine-to-choline ratio partially mediated the protective effect of IL-2RB, suggesting a metabolic link between inflammation and CDC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: