Tri-source electromagnetic coupling framework predicts sound quality improvements in automotive motors, suggesting enhanced noise mitigation strategies.
Persistent discrepancies remain in the perceived far-field noise of automotive permanent-magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs) and the predictions of conventional NVH simulations. To bridge this gap, a Tri-source Electromagnetic Coupling NVH Integrated Framework (Tri-ECNVH) is developed, in which air-gap electromagnetic force harmonics, torque ripple, and cogging torque are treated as a coupled excitation system rather than as independent sources. Traditional workflows usually superpose their responses in the power domain, which tends to underestimate the radiating contribution of torque-related excitations and neglect their phase and order coupling with radial electromagnetic forces. In the proposed Tri-ECNVH framework, the three sources are mapped into the order domain, aligned by spatial order, and applied to the stator with phase consistency, so that inter-source coupling and cross terms are explicitly retained along a unified electromagnetic–structural–acoustic chain. Acoustic radiation is evaluated by prescribing the normal velocity on the stator outer surface as a Neumann boundary condition and computing the far-field A-weighted sound pressure level (SPL) using a boundary element method (BEM) model. Numerical results reveal pronounced cooperative amplification of the three sources at critical orders and within perceptually sensitive frequency bands; relative to independent-source modeling with power-domain summation, Tri-ECNVH predicts peak levels that are typically 5–10 dB higher and reproduces the spectral envelope and peak–valley evolution more faithfully. The framework therefore offers a practical, radiation-oriented basis for multi-source noise mitigation in traction PMSMs and helps narrow the gap between simulation and perceived sound quality in automotive applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: