Analysis shows improved calibration efficiency for crystal plasticity parameters in polycrystalline materials, indicating benefits for complex simulations.
Accurate and efficient determination of crystal plasticity (CP) material parameters is essential for predictive simulations that link microstructures, manufacturing processes, and material properties. This study presents a GPU-accelerated pipeline for calibrating CP material parameters, integrating automatic differentiation (AD)-based sensitivities with gradient-based optimization, built upon our open-source JAX-CPFEM package. This method eliminates reliance on finite-differences in gradient-based approaches while improving efficiency over gradient-free optimization. The effectiveness of the pipeline is demonstrated through five case studies covering various crystal structures and boundary conditions. First, the AD-based sensitivity analysis achieves over 10× speedup compared to finite-difference while maintaining accuracy for complex, nonlinear constitutive laws. Second, a comprehensive analysis of initial starting points on gradient-based optimization demonstrates that using appropriate bounds mitigates potential issues. Across both single-crystal and polycrystalline cases calibrating six material parameters, our pipeline requires approximately 7× fewer iterations and achieves 3× higher efficiency over popular gradient-free methods like Bayesian optimization, regardless of geometry complexity. Furthermore, the successful calibration of twelve parameters in a dual-phase steel model highlights the capability of pipeline to handle high-dimensional optimization problems, which is challenging for gradient-free optimization. Finally, the robustness of our pipeline is validated using noisy synthetic data and experimental tensile data for wrought IN625 over a finite strain range. These results illustrate the applicability of our pipeline to real-world scenarios and its potential for high-dimensional optimization and promising applications in Integrated Computational Materials Engineering workflows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: