Shows improved calibration and predictions in additively manufactured materials, suggesting enhanced design efficiency.
Phenomenological crystal plasticity (CP) models are widely used in Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME) to bridge microstructural features with engineering-scale mechanical behaviour. However, their practical application is hindered by two major challenges: high computational costs of physics-based simulations, and the labour-intensive, trial-and-error nature of parameter calibration. These challenges are amplified in additively manufactured (AM) materials, where location-dependent properties require calibration to be repeated at multiple points to produce a detailed property map. Additionally, a limited understanding of how individual parameters of the CP models influence stress–strain predictions across the strain spectrum compounds these issues, making it challenging to utilise CP models for efficient materials design. To address these limitations, we developed an integrated framework that combines deep neural network (DNN) surrogates, optimisation algorithms (OAs), and explainable AI (XAI) techniques. We also utilised experimental tensile data from AM AlSi10Mg alloy as ground truth since AM materials are expected to benefit the most from our investigation. We demonstrate that, by using OAs such as a Natural Evolutionary Strategy or a Genetic Algorithm, the calibration process can be made more accurate and significantly accelerated. We also investigated the utility of employing deep neural network (DNN) surrogates of CP simulations in the calibration process. The fast-solving DNN surrogates achieved substantial time savings in the absence of OAs, i.e., during exhaustive parameter searches mandated by trial-and-error strategies. However, their effectiveness in parameter discovery was context-dependent when used in conjunction with OAs, since OAs can sometimes converge with fewer simulations than required for DNN training. Furthermore, we applied Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), an XAI method, which revealed intricate interactions among some CP parameters, offering insight into why conventional trial-and-error calibration approaches often prove challenging. Our study contributes to strengthening the practical relevance of CP models for modelling-informed materials engineering and optimisation applications. Finally, our integrated framework offers broad applicability beyond materials modelling, enabling accelerated discovery of tuneable parameters in phenomenological models and providing deeper insight into their contributions to predictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gunasegaram et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: