Observational analysis revealed a moderated mediation model linking perceived AI usefulness and knowledge sharing behaviors, indicating factors influencing organizational learning and innovation.
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into organizational processes brings both opportunities and challenges for knowledge sharing. Knowledge sharing remains a cornerstone of organizational learning and innovation, yet the emergence of AI introduces new complexities to this behavior. In particular, AI-related knowledge is both a valuable tool and a controversial technology, whose dual nature generates uncertainty in employees’ evaluations and decisions about sharing it. Drawing on social cognitive theory (SCT), this study develops a moderated mediation model to explain how personal cognitions and environmental cues jointly shape AI-related knowledge sharing. Within the SCT framework, perceived AI usefulness represents a personal cognitive evaluation, whereas anticipated positive response reflects a social outcome expectation. When employees perceive AI as highly useful, they are more likely to expect positive social feedback, which in turn motivates AI-related knowledge sharing behavior. Moreover, organizational competitive climate weakens this effect by acting as a social discount factor that reduces the perceived significance of social rewards. A three-wave survey of 519 Chinese employees supports these hypotheses, extending SCT by revealing how the dual nature of AI shapes employee outcome expectations and by identifying a socially grounded cognitive pathway that links perceived AI usefulness to knowledge sharing behaviors in organizational contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: