Analysis reveals processing impacts microstructure and magnetic properties in electrical steels, suggesting efficiency improvements.
In this work, different processing routes were investigated to evaluate the effects of hot rolling temperature, annealing before cold rolling (ABCR), and one- or two-stage cold rolling and annealing schedules to obtain more efficient electrical steels. The correlation between processing variables, microstructure, thickness, and magnetic properties was established from the analysis of 3D surface plots. It was found that the lowest core loss values (3.4 W/kg) were obtained when steel is processed by hot rolling (800 °C), ABCR (880 °C–180 min), first cold rolling (up to 0.25 mm), first annealing (850 °C–10 min), second cold rolling (up to 0.2 mm), and second annealing (850 °C–10 min). The better combination between thickness and grain size leads to the enhancement of the magnetic properties, which affects the way eddy and hysteresis losses contribute to the total core losses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: