Analysis shows risk factors for cyberbullying in elementary students, suggesting gender-specific preventive strategies may be vital.
Objectives: This study investigated whether moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) moderates the association between inhibition difficulties and cyberbullying perpetration among elementary students, and whether this moderating effect is further conditioned by gender. Cyberbullying has emerged as a distinct and pervasive social problem in the digital era, and identifying both individual risk factors and protective behaviors is critical for developing effective preventive strategies.Methods: This study analyzed data from 161 fifth-grade elementary school children (78 boys, 83 girls) drawn from the Alpha Generation Digital Daily Survey, wave 2 collected in 2023. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation analyses, and t-tests for independent samples were performed using SPSS 25.0. In addition, the PROCESS Macro Model 3 was used to examine the direct and moderated moderation effects of MVPA and gender, controlling for age, parental household income, and parental education level.Results: A significant three-way interaction emerged between inhibition difficulties, MVPA, and gender (B = .05, p 〈 .05). Simple slope analyses showed that for boys, inhibition difficulties predicted higher cyberbullying when MVPA was low (B = .08, p 〈 .001) or average (B = .04, p 〈 .01), but this effect was not significant when MVPA was high. MVPA did not have a significant moderating effect in girls.Conclusion: The findings indicate that MVPA can buffer the risk of cyberbullying associated with inhibition difficulties in boys but not in girls. These results highlight the importance of gender-specific prevention strategies: promoting regular MVPA may be effective for boys, whereas interventions for girls may need to focus more on social–emotional skills and relational contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: