Retrospective analysis identifies survival benefits in oropharyngeal cancer with machine learning using systemic inflammatory response index and performance status.
Importance: Patient with head and neck cancer of the oropharynx (HNC-OROP) undergo curative-intent definitive or post-operative radiation therapy. The systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) has independent prognostic capacity in HNC-OROP. We hypothesized that the use of SIRI may produce a parsimonious model of HNC-OROP outcomes. Objective: We aimed to investigate the prognostic utility of systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) in oropharyngeal head and neck cancer patients who underwent radiation therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Random survival forest (RSF) machine learning was used to model survival in 568 oropharyngeal cancer patients in this retrospective cohort study. SIRI was calculated via pre-treatment bloodwork. Model validation was performed in an external cohort of 421 oropharyngeal cancer patients. Exposures: Exposure was curative-intent definitive or post-operative radiation therapy for head and neck cancer of the oropharynx (HNC-OROP). Results: This is a retrospective study with 568 and 421 patients in the Roswell Park and external Ohio State University cohorts. We evaluated full and reduced RSF models and a robust decision tree model. The C-index of the models was 0.758 (RSF full), 0.725 (RSF reduced), and 0.702 (decision tree). The incorporation of SIRI (with performance status and smoking history) into a machine learning model identified three risk-groups that significantly stratified overall survival (p < 0.0001). These findings were validated in the external validation cohort (p = 0.0019). Progression-free survival was also significantly different for the three groups in the validation cohort (p = 0.0025). Conclusions and Relevance: An integrated machine learning model using SIRI, performance status, and smoking history was successfully developed and externally validated in oropharyngeal head and neck cancer patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: