Analysis shows consistent imaging repeatability and reproducibility across scanners, indicating reliable prognosis for treatment planning.
Using Bland-Altman analysis, our results for T1, T2, and T2* establish the repeatability and reproducibility, via the limits of agreement and bias estimations, of the FB qRF-MRF sequence and compare to its breath-held qRF-MRF and clinical standard counterparts across scanners and scan conditions. DISCUSSION: Based on the bias and limits of agreement of breath-hold and FB qRF-MRF patients can receive reliable and comparable imaging at different sessions for prognosis and treatment planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: