Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort analysis reveals diagnostic testing disparities for gastrointestinal symptoms in colorectal cancer patients, indicating potential inequities based on socioeconomic status.
Background: Colorectal cancer-related symptoms are commonly seen in primary care. Understanding variations in symptom management is crucial for timely care. Aim: To examine diagnostic testing patterns for gastrointestinal symptoms associated with colorectal cancer in primary care. Design and Setting: Retrospective cohort study using linked primary care data of patients aged ≥40 years presenting with colorectal cancer-related symptoms between 2008 and 2022. Methods: We assessed the proportion of patients receiving diagnostic actions, including medications, pathology, imaging, colonoscopy or specialist referral. We examined differences in testing by socioeconomic status and subsequent colorectal cancer diagnosis. Results: Among 70,107 patients, 378 (0.5%) were diagnosed with colorectal cancer within 12 months. Abdominal pain (32%) and diarrhoea (21%) were the most common symptoms. No investigation or treatment occurred in 20% (change in bowel habit) to 50% (constipation and diarrhoea) of patients. Medication-only management was highest for diarrhoea (11%) and constipation (23%). Blood or imaging tests were most frequent for abdominal pain (36%) and abdominal mass (41%). Colonoscopy or specialist referral was highest for rectal bleeding (67%) and change in bowel habit (60%). Investigation likelihood increased with multiple symptoms or repeat visits (OR 3.40, 95% CI: 3.16–3.65; p < 0.001). Patients aged over 80 were significantly less likely to be investigated or referred (OR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.50–0.55; p < 0.001), while those from more advantaged areas were more likely to be investigated (OR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.38–1.53; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Substantial variation in investigating colorectal cancer-related symptoms may contribute to inequities in diagnostic outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Venning et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: