Cross-sectional study shows food insecurity increases psychological distress in Filipino Americans with hypertension, suggesting urgent attention from primary care providers.
Background: Filipino Americans experience disproportionately high rates of hypertension and remain understudied in health disparities research. Although food insecurity (FI) is a recognized social determinant of health, its influence on psychological distress and chronic illness in this population is not well understood. Purpose: This study examined the relationship between FI and psychological distress among Filipino Americans with hypertension, guided by an adapted Minority Stress Model. Methodology: A cross-sectional, descriptive, correlational study was conducted with 135 Filipino American adults recruited from a primary care clinic in Southern Nevada. Participants completed validated instruments assessing both FI and psychological distress. FI was measured using a standardized FI scale, whereas psychological distress was assessed using the Distress Thermometer and Problem List. Data were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression and nonparametric tests. Results: Income level was the only demographic variable significantly associated with FI ( p = .0002). Food-insecure participants reported higher distress (median score = 4) than food-secure peers (median score = 2, p < .001). After adjusting for age, gender, and income, FI remained strongly associated with sleep problems (OR = 3.4, p = .008), worry (OR = 3.83, p = .009), and sadness (OR = 3.85, p = .02). No significant associations were found between FI and other physical symptoms. Conclusions: Food insecurity is a critical psychosocial stressor linked to increased psychological distress among Filipino Americans with hypertension. Implications: Nurse practitioners and primary care providers should incorporate culturally responsive, community-engaged approaches when screening for both FI and psychological distress in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serafica et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: