Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental findings reveal that phase change materials enhance thermal management in lithium-ion batteries, suggesting improved safety and efficiency.
Purpose Thermal management is essential to ensure the performance and safety of lithium-ion batteries, and effective heat dissipation helps prevent excessive temperature rise. This study aims to explore advanced passive thermal management strategies by developing a coupled electrochemical–thermal model to investigate the effectiveness of different phase change material (PCM) configurations: internal (within a hollow mandrel), external (surrounding the cell) and combined internal/external placement. The objective is to contain temperature rise while optimizing battery pack dimensions. In addition, a parametric analysis on the external PCM thickness is carried out to identify optimal design solutions for space-constrained applications. Design/methodology/approach An 18650 lithium cobalt oxide (LCO) battery (3.7 V, 2.6 Ah) is studied, combining a multiscale pseudo-two-dimensional electrochemical model with a two-dimensional axis-symmetric thermal domain. Sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate is selected as PCM and modeled with an enthalpy-based method to account for latent heat effects. Equal PCM volume is used to compare internal and external configurations. Findings The internal/external PCM configuration delays the battery critical temperature of 50 °C by up to 120.5%, compared to the case without PCM. External- and internal-only PCM provide delays of 58.6% and 40.5%, respectively. The parametric study shows that, to maintain a safe operating temperature of 45°C, an optimal PCM thickness of 1.66 mm is required for the internal/external layout versus 1.96 mm for the external-only case, corresponding up to a 5.4% battery pack volume saving. Originality/value This work highlights the benefit of internal PCM integration in lithium-ion batteries, improving both thermal buffering and spatial efficiency. The findings offer guidance for designing compact, passively cooled battery systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piccirillo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: