Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multicohort study shows tailored treatments enhance progression-free survival in transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients, indicating the efficacy of various therapies.
Introduction Transplant-eligible NDMM (TE-NDMM) exhibits heterogeneous risk profiles requiring tailored approaches. We evaluated three stratified strategies:Ultra-high-risk (UHiR): ≥2 high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs: t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), del(17p), gain(1q) or circulating plasma cells (CPC≥1%).Extramedullary disease (EMD)Non-UHiRnor EMD Each strategy was implemented based on patient-specific profiles, ensuring precise treatment alignment. UHiR patients received aggressive therapies, EMD cases received quadruplet, while non-UHiR/EMD followed standard protocols, optimizing outcomes across diverse risk groups. Methods Real-world cohorts from First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (2024–2025): - UHiR cohort (n=26): Dara-KAD (daratumumab, carfilzomib, liposomal doxorubicin, dexamethasone) induction → tandem ASCT → carfilzomib/pomalidomide maintenance. Primary endpoint: 2-year PFS. - EMD cohort (n=22): KAPD (carfilzomib, liposomal doxorubicin, pomalidomide, dexamethasone) induction ± ASCT. Primary endpoint: dual-negativity rate (bone marrow multi-colour flow MRD<10⁻⁵ + PET-CT CR post-4 cycles). - Non-UHiR nor EMD cohort (n=403): Suboptimal responders (SOR) was difined as ≥minimal response (MR) but <complete response (CR) to first-line (1L) induction. Retrospective/prospective analysis of: - Cohort A: SOR who received 2L intensified induction → ASCT (n=41) - Cohort B: SOR who received direct ASCT without 2L (n=214) - Cohort C: 1L CR → ASCT (n=148). Primary endpoints: PFS, OS. Results UHiR cohort (median follow-up 12.5months): - Post-induction response: CR 57%, VGPR 38%, MRD negativity 43%. - Median PFS: 25 months. - Mobilization success: 100% (15/16 required plerixafor; 9/16 collected ≥6×10⁶ CD34⁺/kg). - Grade ≥3 AEs: Neutropenia (23.1%), infections (23.1%).EMD cohort (15 evaluable): - Dual-negativity rate: 40% (6/15). - Extramedullary ORR: 80% (CR 20%, PR 60%). - Mobilization: 100% success (9/9 collected >4×10⁶ CD34⁺/kg; 66.7% used plerixafor). - Two year PFS: 70%.Non-UHiRnor EMD cohort cohort(median follow-up 10.0 months): - 2L induction (Cohort A): 91.7% (37/41) deepened responses (Dara-based: 52.4% CR). - Post-ASCT CR rates: Cohort A 63.4% (vs. Cohort B 48.1%, p=0.08). - PFS: SOR without 2L (Cohort B) had inferior PFS vs. OR (Cohort C) (HR 1.72, p<0.01); 2L intensified induction (Cohort A) bridged this gap (PFS comparable to Cohort C, HR 0.93, p=0.64). - Mobilization: Plerixafor use higher in Cohort A (58.5% vs. 40.2% overall) but CD34⁺yield comparable (median 5.1×10⁶/kg). Conclusion Stratified approaches improved outcomes in high-risk TE-NDMM: - UHiR: Dara-KAD + tandem ASCT achieved 95% ORR and 25 months median PFS. - EMD: KAPd induced 40% dual-negativity. - SOR: 2L intensified induction (particularly Dara-based regimens) rescued survival disparity vs. optimal responders. Mobilization remained feasible across all cohorts with proactive plerixafor use. Real-world evidence supports risk-adapted induction, transplantation, and mobilization strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: