Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dynamic spatial analysis reveals housing prices increase income disparities in rural areas, suggesting housing policy adjustments for inclusive growth.
This study investigates how housing prices influence urban–rural income inequality (URG) in mainland China by explicitly incorporating spatial interdependence and nonlinear adjustment mechanisms, features often neglected in previous research. Using a balanced panel of 31 provinces from 2005 to 2023, we develop a dynamic spatial panel threshold model that jointly accounts for temporal persistence, spatial spillovers, and regime-dependent estimation. This framework enables a full decomposition of housing price effects into direct, indirect (spillover), and total impacts across distinct market regimes. The results reveal three major insights. First, URG in mainland China displays strong temporal persistence, suggesting that income disparities evolve gradually over time. Second, rising housing prices significantly widen the urban–rural income gap, both within provinces and through interprovincial transmission, underscoring the amplifying role of spatial spillovers. Third, threshold estimation identifies a critical housing price level of ln(HP) = 8.4843 (approximately 4838.21 RMB/m2), revealing that the inequality-enhancing effect of housing prices is stronger in low-price regions but diminishes as markets mature and affordability constraints intensify. These findings provide new empirical evidence that the housing market functions as a nonlinear and asymmetric driver of regional inequality in mainland China, with implications for housing policy and inclusive growth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: