Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case study reveals workshops at AGCI over three decades foster interdisciplinarity in Earth systems science, indicating significant societal implications.
Interdisciplinarity is widely believed to be necessary to further knowledge about complex systems and inform potential solutions. Yet the practice of fostering it is not well articulated, especially by those who regularly do it. Various obstacles, including logistical, institutional, interactional, and cognitive barriers, hinder interdisciplinarity. Even so, scientific agendas with societal significance, such as global change research, emerged over the 20th century with interdisciplinary requirements at their core. In 1989, the Aspen Global Change Institute (AGCI) was founded as an interdisciplinary center to further the understanding of Earth systems and their relevance to society. Here we present workshops (n=81) organized by AGCI over the period 1990–2022 as a reflective case study on practicing interdisciplinarity. By describing our experience, along with data from participation records (n=2401), evaluations (n=1146), and publications (n=71), we offer this case with lessons learned as a complement to formalized scholarship on interdisciplinarity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katzenberger et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: