Discussion reveals Cassirer’s unclear position on politics and the implications of contract and natural rights in left-Kantianism.
After a brief overview of Cassirer’s symbolic form argument, the discussion turns to one question: does Cassirer offer a lucid normative position in politics? My core argument is that he does not. Three arguments providing potential insights into his moral and political sensibilities are contested: the first concerns his The Myth of the State text; the second, the Bildung tradition; and third, his arguments on the contract and natural rights tradition. The latter argument, in particular, underpins the claim that Cassirer was sympathetic to liberalism. The concept of left-Kantianism is then examined in the context of the German socialist tradition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew Vincent (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: