What type of study is this?

This is a Literature Review study.

What question did this study set out to answer?

This review aims to identify protective factors that enhance resilience and well-being among operators during natural hazard events.

December 11, 2025Social SciencesOpen Access

Protective Factors of Resilience and Well-Being Among Natural Hazard Event Helpers: A Rapid Systematic Literature Review

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

This review aims to identify protective factors that enhance resilience and well-being among operators during natural hazard events.
Rapid systematic literature review of research from Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and PsycINFO
Screened 876 records, selecting 84 that met inclusion criteria
Analysis of individual and organizational factors affecting resilience and well-being
Found a variety of research methods and sample sizes across studies
Identified key individual factors like personality traits and coping strategies
Highlighted the importance of organizational factors, including training and social support for helpers

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Systematic review identifies protective factors enhancing resilience and well-being of operators during natural hazard events, suggesting training and social support can improve outcomes.

Cite This Study

Grossi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69401b172d562116f28f7310 https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14120708

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Systematic review identifies protective factors enhancing resilience and well-being of operators during natural hazard events, suggesting training and social support can improve outcomes.

Protective Factors of Resilience and Well-Being Among Natural Hazard Event Helpers: A Rapid Systematic Literature Review

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Protective Factors of Resilience and Well-Being Among Natural Hazard Event Helpers: A Rapid Systematic Literature Review

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider