Modified ampacity calculation shows grounding modes influence cable losses and temperature in high-voltage cables, suggesting optimization for performance.
To address the limitation of the IEC 60287 standard in accurately representing the electrothermal characteristics of cables under different grounding conditions, this study proposes a modified equivalent thermal resistance method, using a YJLW03-Z 64/110 1 × 1200 mm2 high-voltage single-core cable as a case study to analyze three typical grounding modes, namely two-end solid bonding, segmented solid bonding, and semiconductive outer sheath. Equivalent circuit models are established to calculate the induced current, voltage, and losses of the metallic sheath and armor. Based on these results, the equivalent thermal resistance model is modified, and correction formulas for cable ampacity considering grounding effects are derived. The proposed model is validated through numerical simulations under typical laying conditions and field tests conducted in Zhoushan, Zhejiang Province. Results show that grounding modes significantly influence the electromagnetic losses and temperature distribution of cables. Segmented solid bonding effectively reduces sheath losses and increases ampacity, while its enhancement tends to stabilize beyond two bonding sections. The semiconductive outer sheath improves electric field distribution and thermal stability with limited ampacity gain. This study provides theoretical guidance and engineering reference for optimizing grounding designs, ampacity evaluation, and digital operation of high-voltage cable systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: