Experimental analysis reveals kinetic models for CO2 methanation in low-content Ru catalysts, suggesting improved designs.
A series of low‐content Ru‐based catalysts supported on Al 2 O 3 , TiO 2 , CeO 2 , MgO, and ZrO 2 were synthesized via incipient wetness impregnation and evaluated for CO 2 methanation. Among them, Ru/TiO 2 exhibited the highest activity in terms of turnover frequency (TOF = 3.35 s −1 ) and selectivity toward CH 4 (> 95%). To elucidate the underlying reaction mechanism, operando Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy (DRIFTS) analyses were performed, revealing the presence of key surface intermediates. Based on these observations, several power‐law and Langmuir–Hinshelwood–Hougen–Watson (LHHW) kinetic models were formulated and fitted to experimental data. A detailed comparison of different mechanistic hypotheses was conducted, highlighting the role of CO 2 dissociation and stepwise hydrogenation pathways. A two active site model that considers CO 2 adsorption on the basic sites of the support and the continuation of the reaction by hydrogen spillover from Ru nanoparticles provided the best agreement with experimental results. Overall, the combination of catalytic testing, operando spectroscopy, and kinetic modeling offers a comprehensive understanding of the CO 2 methanation pathway over Ru/TiO 2 and provides a reliable basis for catalyst comparison and reactor design to effectively manage thermal issues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rizzetto et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: