This research demonstrates enhanced CO2 conversion in bimetallic catalysts, indicating improved efficiency for catalysis applications.
• Cu incorporation promotes low-temperature activity in Ru/TiO 2 catalysts. • Ru–Cu bimetallic catalysts achieve 86% CO 2 conversion at 350 °C. • Ru–Cu interaction improves metal dispersion, reducibility, and acidity. • Ru–Cu mixed nanoparticles favor enhanced CO 2 adsorption. • A reaction mechanism involving formate and carbonyl intermediates was identified. Exploring efficient monometallic or bimetallic supported catalysts to improve CO 2 methanation at low temperatures is an important topic in the field of heterogeneous catalysis. In the current research, bimetallic Ru-Cu/TiO 2 catalysts were prepared using the co-deposition-precipitation with urea method. Augmenting the ruthenium content from 0.5 to 1.5 wt% boosted the CO 2 conversion and improved the reducibility of the catalysts. Optimal metal loadings were found to be 2.0% copper and 1.5% ruthenium, and the synergistic interaction between Ru and Cu in the bimetallic catalysts was confirmed for CO 2 methanation. The Ru, Cu and Ru-Cu catalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction, BET specific surface area, STEM-EDS microscopy, H 2 /TPR, CO adsorption DRIFTS, CO oxidation DRIFTS (as a model reaction to observe adsorbed species and reaction intermediates on the Ru, Cu and Ru-Cu catalyst surface), methanation followed by DRIFTS, as well as XPS. The outcomes revealed the strong interaction between Ru and Cu on the TiO 2 anatase support, which led to modified metal dispersion when both metals were present. Indeed, the heterogenous charge distribution in the bimetallic structure leads to cooperative nucleophilic and Lewis-acidic sites for CO 2 adsorption and bond activation. Additionally, hydrogen spillover in Ru-Cu/TiO 2 was observed, which improved CO 2 methanation and adsorption capacity. As for the Ru-Cu/TiO 2 catalyst, catalytic evaluation confirmed its significantly enhanced activity, selectivity, and stability with respect to the corresponding monometallic Ru and Cu catalysts. XPS and in-situ DRIFTS analyses indicated that metallic Ru 0 and Cu 0 were the most active species. Furthermore, the bimetallic catalyst demonstrated good reusability, maintaining its activity over repeated reaction cycles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Camposeco et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: